What happened when someone chained a cross to Gay Street?

It started with a mysterious act of apparent malice, but it turned into an expression of grace. According to Manhattan resident Micah Latter, Good Friday this year saw the arrival on her street of a huge wooden cross, chained to a lamppost. No-one knew where it had come from, or who had put it there, and more bizarrely still in the days that followed it kept moving around – being fixed to various posts and fences.

This cross was chained to a post in Gay St. Danpire/Instagram

The name of this particular part of New York? Gay Street.

At first Latter was perplexed and upset. As a committed Christian herself, she got the distinct impression that the instrument used to torture and crucify Jesus was being misappropriated to spread hatred (even though the street was actually named in 1833, when 'gay' meant something very different). She told website Popsugar: 'As a Christian, the cross is a sign of love, peace, and hope and it was clear the mysterious owner of the cross was not sharing those same values.'

Then, Latter had an idea. She rallied friends from the neighbourhood, grabbed an eclectic range of paints and some champagne, and embarked on a very creative response to the unheralded and unexplained actions of the unknown cross-mover. In an impromptu act that was part-street party, part-craft session, Latter and her neighbours (and some intrigued passers-by), repainted the cross in the colours of the rainbow, partly to demonstrate inclusivity to the LGBT community, and partly as a demonstration that the cross is fundamentally about grace, not exclusion.

In a final twist, she also added her own locks, and superglued the existing ones, so that the cross could not be moved or removed by its mysterious owner. 'It belongs to the street now,' she said.

Some Christians will no doubt be sniffy about Micah Latter's actions, worrying that the historic and precious symbol of Jesus' death and suffering has been defaced by a political slogan, and one which does not align with the historic orthodox teaching of the Church. But of course, even the original owner was using the cross for a less-than-ethical purpose, and seeking to make it a symbol of hatred couldn't be further from the truth. Once, a long time ago, the cross was a symbol of death, darkness and mis-used power, and Jesus redeemed it. We don't want to go backwards on that one.

More positively, I think that in her act of creative defiance, Ms Latter has disarmed a potentially painful and unhelpful attack, apparently sent from within the church to the heart of the gay community (despite the anomaly around its actual naming, the street is in Greenwich Village, where many of New York's LGBT residents live). In fact, she's now installed a semi-permanent monument to the unconditional, all-inclusive love of God, in a community which might always hear that message shared. The original owner may not agree, but I think it's a wonderfully prophetic act, and one that the rest of the church would do well to learn from.

Martin Saunders is a Contributing Editor for Christian Today and the Deputy CEO of Youthscape. Follow him on Twitter @martinsaunders.

News
Three words that changed history: ‘Jesus became sin'
Three words that changed history: ‘Jesus became sin'

As we enter Easter, we want to centre our attention on the significance of Christ’s work of redemption for all of humanity.

Gloucester Cathedral to unveil stunning new pipe organ
Gloucester Cathedral to unveil stunning new pipe organ

Gloucester Cathedral has said that this year’s Organ Festival will be extra special, as it will see the unveiling of its brand new organ.

Religious freedom violations increasing in Nicaragua
Religious freedom violations increasing in Nicaragua

The situation has declined since 2018.

Päivi Räsänen calls for repeal of hate speech laws across Europe after shock conviction
Päivi Räsänen calls for repeal of hate speech laws across Europe after shock conviction

All copies of a decades old pamphlet are to be destroyed after Finland's former Minister of the Interior was convicted of hate speech - even though the law that convicted her did not exist at the time the pamphlet was published.