Shane Claiborne challenges Jerry Falwell to debate Trump and Jesus

Radical Christian Shane Claiborne has challenged Liberty University president Jerry Falwell Jnr to a public debate following the defeat in the Senate of a bill aimed at repealing Obamacare.

The vote represented a humiliating blow to President Donald Trump, of whom Falwell has been an outspoken supporter.

Referring to the three Republican senators who ensured the 'skinny repeal' bill's defeat as 'RINOs or 'Republicans In Name Only', Falwell tweeted: 'How do Sens Collins, Murkowski, McCain and other RINOs sleep at night running as Repubs only to deceive their conservative constituents?'

Susan Collins, Lisa Murkowski and John McCain all voted against, the latter in a moment of high drama seen by many as payback for Trump after the president insulted him on the campaign trail.

Claiborne criticised Falwell by name last year on the Red Letter Christians blog: saying: 'Many of us grieve that our brothers and sisters once known for their zeal for Jesus have been more passionate about exalting Donald Trump this year than Jesus.'

In response to Falwell's tweet last night he replied: 'Honestly I've wondered how you sleep at night. Would you have a public conversation with me about whether or not Jesus would support Trump?'

Falwell has yet to reply.

News
Tom Holland appointed Bede Librarian at Durham Cathedral
Tom Holland appointed Bede Librarian at Durham Cathedral

Holland said he was honoured to take up the role.

Two more Christians confirmed killed in Iran protests
Two more Christians confirmed killed in Iran protests

A total of 19 Christians have been confirmed dead as a result of a crackdown on anti-government protests.

Christians lament government's new Islamophobia definition
Christians lament government's new Islamophobia definition

“The positives are relative to how bad it could have been."

House of Lords votes to close online porn 'loopholes'
House of Lords votes to close online porn 'loopholes'

The Online Safety Act may have reduced online pornography, but may also have been used to stifle free speech.