Paralysed US Supreme Court dodges decision on Obamacare birth control

Members of the Little Sisters of the Poor seen here in a Becket Fund for Religious Liberty YouTube video regarding their lawsuit against the Department of Health and Human Services over the Obamacare contraceptive mandate. YouTube/The Becket Fund for Religious Liberty

The US Supreme Court on Monday failed to resolve a major case involving the Obamacare law's mandatory birth control coverage, telling lower courts to reconsider the matter after tossing out their rulings favouring President Barack Obama.

The court, which is deadlocked following the death of conservative Justice Antonin Scalia, did not rule on the merits of the legal challenge by Christian employers who objected to the 2010 healthcare law's requirement that they provide female workers with medical insurance paying for contraceptives.

It threw out seven rulings by federal appeals courts around the country that had backed the Obama administration.

The justices handed at least a short-term victory to the religious employers, primarily Roman Catholic organisations.

The decision suggested a possible compromise for the lower courts that would allow women to get contraception coverage without violating the religious rights of employers, by having the government arrange coverage directly with health insurers rather than requiring employers to sign off on it.

article,article,article,article Related

Among the employers challenging the contraception mandate were the Roman Catholic archdioceses of Washington and Pittsburgh, the Little Sisters of the Poor order of nuns, and Christian colleges.

Another organisation, Priests for Life, attacked the Supreme Court's move. Its national director Fr Frank Pavone said: "One of the key issues at stake in the 2016 elections is religious freedom, and the persistent effort of the Obama administration to force priests and other believers to violate their faith by providing abortion-inducing drugs and contraceptives in their health care insurance."

He added that the action by the Court "does not make the issue go away, nor will it make voters forget the stark political differences between those who respect religious freedom and those who do not."

Gretchen Borchelt of the National Women's Law Center said: "We are disappointed that the court did not resolve once and for all whether the religious beliefs of religiously affiliated nonprofit employers can block women's seamless access to birth control."

Additional reporting by Reuters.

related articles
Victory for Obama as Supreme Court backs healthcare reforms
Victory for Obama as Supreme Court backs healthcare reforms

Victory for Obama as Supreme Court backs healthcare reforms

Republican candidates and faith: What have we learned from the campaign?
Republican candidates and faith: What have we learned from the campaign?

Republican candidates and faith: What have we learned from the campaign?

Supreme Court to hear religious objection to Obamacare
Supreme Court to hear religious objection to Obamacare

Supreme Court to hear religious objection to Obamacare

Supreme Court faces 4-4 split in Obamacare contraception case
Supreme Court faces 4-4 split in Obamacare contraception case

Supreme Court faces 4-4 split in Obamacare contraception case

News
We need a moral reformation - not just a quiet revival
We need a moral reformation - not just a quiet revival

When has any true revival ever been quiet?

China imprisons church leaders on 'unfounded' fraud charges
China imprisons church leaders on 'unfounded' fraud charges

"Our brothers did not commit fraud, and the offerings of our church are not fraud."

Churches should open in summer to prevent knife crime
Churches should open in summer to prevent knife crime

A Christian coalition said that knife crime among young people tends to spike in the summer months. It says churches can be part of the response.

Three-year restoration of Lambeth Palace completed
Three-year restoration of Lambeth Palace completed

Three year project makes Lambeth Palace more friendly to the environment and the disabled.