No-fault divorce is a 'cheaters' charter' which will damage marriage

 Pixabay

The Government is setting out to destroy the foundations of marriage by allowing cheating or bored spouses to walk away from a solemn, lifelong commitment whenever they choose and with the full support, and even encouragement, of the state.

It's all very well for the Minister to claim that he will always uphold the institution of marriage but marriage is being turned into an agreement with less security than a tenancy contract. This is not what people want. If it was they would not commit 'until death them do part'.

It abandons the principle of the state supporting those who take personal responsibility. No-fault divorce could see a person divorced, have their access to their children ended, their assets divided and themselves removed from their home by court order, all despite being faithful to their marriage vows.

What is particularly concerning is the Government's own impact assessment conceded that these changes will lead to a spike in the number of divorces and broken families. Based on previous reforms, this spike is likely to become the new normal.

Children do better in married households, even when there is conflict. It will be highly detrimental to outcomes for children to encourage more couples to end their marriages.

The Minister's response to insert a cooling off period is wholly inadequate.

Under our well established current system thousands of couples start legal proceedings, but don't go through with them. Some of these will be reconciliations. The marriage is given another chance. Most people know those who have been through very rocky patches in their marriage but stayed together.

It is concerning that advocates of no-fault divorce are so dismissive of the possibility of reconciliation. The in-built delay allows calm reflection and for one or both sides to pull back from the brink. A more hurried divorce process makes reconciliation less likely. No amount of convenience to the legal system could possibly justify this.

Rather than scrapping this, we should be adding in additional support, such as counselling to help more couples to stick together.

In the late 1990s the Government trialled more support for married couples but abandoned it after just a few months due to the costs. Yet we know from government studies that children from broken homes are up to five times as likely to suffer from poorer mental health than those whose parents stay together, more likely to live in poverty and perform less well at school.

No-fault divorce is incompatible with both the weight of evidence that shows marriage is the gold standard of relationships and needs support and the Government's obsession to appear to be 'progressive'. There is nothing progressive about this cheaters' charter.

Colin Hart is the Chairman of the Coalition for Marriage and The Christian Institute

News
Safeguarding complaint against Sarah Mullally dismissed
Safeguarding complaint against Sarah Mullally dismissed

The Archbishop of York has decided not to take further action against Dame Sarah Mullally in relation to a safeguarding complaint made against her.

Christians plan rally against Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill
Christians plan rally against Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill

Organisers say they wish to send a message to the Scottish government.

Philip Yancey and a heartbroken reflection on grace, failure and restoration 
Philip Yancey and a heartbroken reflection on grace, failure and restoration 

This painful chapter reminds us of one of the hardest truths Christians must face: even after receiving God’s free, unearned grace, we remain vulnerable to sin.

The Church of England and Living in Love and Faith: where have we got to? 
The Church of England and Living in Love and Faith: where have we got to? 

It is clear to anyone who has been following the LLF process that it is in disarray.