Key victory for parental rights in Chile

 (Photo: Unsplash/Annie Spratt)

The right of parents to decide how their children are educated, especially when it comes to sex education, has been protected following a ruling by the Chilean Constitutional Tribunal.

The tribunal declared unconstitutional certain provisions in a children's rights Bill that would have prioritised children's "progressive autonomy" over parental oversight.

The demand that sex education be "secular and non-sexist" was also overturned following a local campaign.

The Alliance Defending Freedom (ADF), which supported campaigners, said the provision would have led to the exclusion of different religious and moral perspectives in teaching on the subject.

Tomás Henríquez, Director of Advocacy in Latin America and the Caribbean for ADF International, said the verdict had important ramifications beyond Chile.

"The state should not interfere with parent-child relationships," he said. 

"We welcome the Chilean Constitutional Tribunal's ruling, which sets a strong precedent for the protection of parental rights in Latin America.

"A majority of judges confirmed that the government cannot impose a worldview on religious and moral issues, nor interfere without grave reasons in the decision-making of parents when it comes to directing their children's upbringing and the exercise of their rights."

News
Tom Holland appointed Bede Librarian at Durham Cathedral
Tom Holland appointed Bede Librarian at Durham Cathedral

Holland said he was honoured to take up the role.

Two more Christians confirmed killed in Iran protests
Two more Christians confirmed killed in Iran protests

A total of 19 Christians have been confirmed dead as a result of a crackdown on anti-government protests.

Christians lament government's new Islamophobia definition
Christians lament government's new Islamophobia definition

“The positives are relative to how bad it could have been."

House of Lords votes to close online porn 'loopholes'
House of Lords votes to close online porn 'loopholes'

The Online Safety Act may have reduced online pornography, but may also have been used to stifle free speech.