Christian County Clerk Kim Davis Asked to Pay Thousands of Dollars By Group Who Dragged Her to Court

Rowan County clerk Kim Davis now faces a new legal challenge after winning a court battle. Reuters

The Christian county clerk from Kentucky who made national headlines and sparked a debate across America after refusing to issue marriage licences to homosexuals is now facing a new legal challenge, which can force her to pay hundreds of thousands of dollars for standing up to her faith.

According to a report from Christian News, the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) recently filed a formal complaint against Rowan county clerk Kim Davis, asking the Christian woman to pay for the cost of the legal battle between the two camps, which is estimated at around $233,000.

"Courts recognize that when successful civil rights plaintiffs obtain a direct benefit from a court-ordered victory, such as in this case, they can be entitled to their legal expenses to deter future civil rights violations by government officials," ACLU Kentucky legal director William Sharp told Christian News, explaining why they filed the complaint against Davis before the district court under Judge David Bunning.

The Christian clerk's camp, however, maintained that Davis cannot be forced to cover attorney fees and other legal expenses of the complainants, because she ultimately prevailed in the end in the court battle.

"The ACLU is not entitled to attorney's fees according to the prevailing standard in the Sixth Circuit," explained Mat Staver, the founder and chairman of Liberty Counsel Christian law firm who helped defend Davis' case. "Kim Davis won the case and the case is closed. County clerks are now able to perform their public service without being forced to compromise their religious liberty," he said.

It can be recalled that Judge Bunning dismissed all existing complaints against Davis last August, following the state legislature's decision to pass a law that will remove county clerks' names in all marriage licences. Davis' camp considered this move as a victory.

"In light of these proceedings, and in view of the fact that the marriage licences continue to be issued without incident, there no longer remains a case or controversy before the court," Judge Bunning said in his decision.

related articles
Atheists want Texas town to remove \'God\'s Country\' sign but mayor standing firm
Atheists want Texas town to remove 'God's Country' sign but mayor standing firm

Atheists want Texas town to remove 'God's Country' sign but mayor standing firm

Kim Davis faces another lawsuit — from a man who wants to marry his computer
Kim Davis faces another lawsuit — from a man who wants to marry his computer

Kim Davis faces another lawsuit — from a man who wants to marry his computer

DA Carson: The Kim Davis case shows what Christians will face in standing up for the gospel
DA Carson: The Kim Davis case shows what Christians will face in standing up for the gospel

DA Carson: The Kim Davis case shows what Christians will face in standing up for the gospel

Kim Davis: Campaigners hail victory after same-sex marriage lawsuits dismissed
Kim Davis: Campaigners hail victory after same-sex marriage lawsuits dismissed

Kim Davis: Campaigners hail victory after same-sex marriage lawsuits dismissed

News
Priest refuses communion to MP who backed assisted suicide
Priest refuses communion to MP who backed assisted suicide

Is communion to given to anyone who wants it, to be regarded as holy or used as a political tool?

Glastonbury and the banality of evil
Glastonbury and the banality of evil

When the Glastonbury mob were calling for death to the IDF, they were in effect calling for the death of Israeli Jews.

Who were the Anabaptists?
Who were the Anabaptists?

This year is the 500th anniversary of the founding of the Anabaptist movement - a chapter in Christian history that is not so well known.

Faith leaders say taxing rich will bring down energy bills, help environment
Faith leaders say taxing rich will bring down energy bills, help environment

The call is, not for the first time, to tax the rich